In information and communications technology, a Request for Comments (RFC) is a type of . The RFC process is documented in RFC (The Internet Standards Process, Revision 3). The RFC production process differs from the. Request for Comments This RFC was published in RFC – Not All RFCs are Standards · RFC – The Internet Standards Process . 28 Jun URL: Description: Describes the standards drafting process for IETF and related organizations. Privacy.
|Published (Last):||11 December 2011|
|PDF File Size:||5.57 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.96 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Pages using RFC magic links Articles lacking reliable rfc 2026 from November All articles lacking reliable references Articles containing potentially dated statements from All articles containing potentially dated rrc.
A Proposed Rfc 2026 specification is stable, has resolved known design choices, has received significant community review, and appears to enjoy enough community interest to be considered valuable.
RFC have been designated historic. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
However, as with all technical specifications, Proposed Standards may be revised if problems are found or better solutions are identified, when experiences rfc 2026 deploying implementations of such technologies at scale is gathered. An Internet Standard which may simply be referred to rfc 2026 a Standard is characterized by a high degree of technical maturity and by a generally held belief that the specified protocol or service provides significant benefit to rfc 2026 Internet community.
Characteristics of Internet Standards A specification for which significant implementation and successful operational experience has been obtained may be elevated to the Internet Standard level. A Draft Standard must be well-understood and known to be quite stable, both in its semantics and as a basis for developing an implementation.
Proposed Standards are rfc 2026 such quality that implementations can be deployed in the Internet. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document.
Request for Comments
The border rfc 2026 standards track and BCP is often unclear. Having a standard makes it much easier to develop software and hardware that rgc different networks because software and hardware can be developed one layer at a time.
Kolkman Request for Comments: Characteristics of Internet Standards. Later, an RFC is elevated as Internet Standardwith an additional sequence number, when maturity has reached an acceptable level.
Many Proposed Standards are actually deployed rfc 2026 the Internet rfc 2026 used extensively, as stable protocols. The IAB can publish its own documents.
On his death inhis obituary was published as RFC IETF Proposed Standards documents have been subject to open development and review by the Internet technical community, generally including a number of formal cross-discipline reviews and, rfc 2026, a security review. In general, an Internet Standard is a specification that is stable and well-understood, rfc 2026 technically competent, has multiple, independent, and interoperable implementations with substantial rf experience, enjoys significant public rfc 2026, and is recognizably useful in some or all parts of the Internet.
For complete understanding of the requirements for standardization, those documents should be read in conjunction with this document.
RFC – The Internet Standards Process Revision 3
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. A specific action rfc 2026 the IESG rfc 2026 required to 2206 a specification onto the standards track at the “Proposed Standard” level. Usually, neither implementation nor operational experience is required for the designation of a specification as a Proposed Standard.
An experimental RFC may be promoted to standards track if it becomes popular and works well.
The Origins of the Internet. This approach facilitates initial rounds of peer review before documents mature into RFCs. Views from a Multistakeholder Group Future Thinking: Rfc 2026 document only updates the characterization of Proposed Standards from Section 4.
For the Wikipedia process, see Wikipedia: